Incinerators, Cip6, CDR, Zero Waste, various Any other business.
In this interview Marcegaglia highlights the difficulties that companies face when producing plants from renewable sources like wind, solar, biomass.
For Marcegaglia weaknesses to be addressed are:
· the clarity of incentives;
· overcome the logic of Nimby ;
· in the weakness of the authorities' imposing plants.
strengths appear to be dialogue with the people and the dining bill.
I am not convinced of the argument Marcegaglia and try to explain why.
clear impetus
In 1992 he started the ' operation Cip6 with the aim to shake up the monopoly position of ENEL and to attract' attention on private generation from renewable sources, especially wind and biomass . 'S operation is financed by a special surcharge (7%) in the electricity bill the user (component A3).
The critical operation is not the 'burden of the program, but the' normative approach, which has distorted much of the targets. In fact, under "sources sources "were inserted incinerators. were also "treated" with plants fueled by renewable sources process fuel, residues, recover energy from fossil fuels.
incinerators and power plants to process fuel, residues, recover energy from fossil fuel have nothing to do with renewable and, among other things, to produce the most polluting energy fossil power plants.
addition 's exclusion of' incentive for incinerators and in particular, that relating to biodegradable fraction of waste is specifically sanctioned by the European Directive 2001/77/EC .
With the recognition and notwithstanding the many extensions over the years various governments have allowed to continue the practice of 'incentive aware of the distortions of the system and despite several warnings the European Community, which does not provide incentives for sources other than wind, solar and biomass, in fact distort the electricity market.
With the 2008 budget, the government seemed have put an end to the recognition notwithstanding.
Instead, with the 'waste emergency in Campania, the DL 172/2008 reopened Cip6 for incinerators, all departing from the December 31, 2009.
The decree stipulates that for areas in emergency incentives are also attributed to the inorganic part of the waste, while the areas not only in an emergency for the organic share of waste incinerated.
The distortions of the CIP-6 are highlighted in 'hearing before the Tenth Productive Activities Commission of the Chamber of Deputies on February 11, 2009.
Cip6 / 2
In order to "promote the 'output from the plant Cip6", considered low-efficient and non-adherent to the logic of a liberalized market, the Law 99/2009 is has two objectives:
· correct the distortions of Cip6;
· reduce the burden of the tariff component of the bill.
's membership is free to exit the incentives and Ministerial Decree of 02.12.2009 implementing the provisions of the law. The DM identifies the facilities that you can join: those powered by fuel processing, residues, recover energy from fossil fuel ( regarded as renewable sources).
addition, please refer to the following mechanisms to measure the 'output of the Conventions plants fueled by renewable sources and "waste" (another sore point of Cip6).
early termination joined the 30 facilities for approximately 4300 MW. The early termination of the incentives will be discounted by 6% and the sum will be paid everything immediately .
remains to be seen if in future there will seriously incinerators . E 'desirable plants are defined incinerators with energy recovery and not "power stations to renewable sources" and that included in the calculation mechanism similar to that currently far less rewarding than the renewable receive the ncentivi only the organic part waste burned .
addition, it should be precluded any possibility of access to certified green, white, and priority dispatch for renewables, natural recipients of promotional measures.
short, clear incentives as advocated by the same Marcegaglia (...).
L 'Cip 6 operation has cost the taxpayer about 35 billion euro and most of the incentives have been used for incinerators and similar, ie the equivalent of 'investment needed to move to nuclear .
Meanwhile, for 2010 have been allocated rights Cip 6 equal to 3403 MW daily to companies that have little to do with renewables.
In future, this government is about to make a Cip6 for nuclear power? No thanks, we already .
EXCESS OF LOGIC NIMBY
In the province of Bari, Marcegaglia group, intends to make two "power plants fueled by renewable sources" means a Cerignola el 'to the other because of the Sultans in Modugno on the administrative border Bitonto . The power that will develop the power plant is 10MW, energy not needed to satisfy regional , as shown in the graph taken from PEAR Puglia 2007.
As you can see, Puglia manufactures and distributes the Italian system, 50% of its energy production. Thus, a production of 10MW unnecessary for Apulia, insignificant and irrelevant to the amount of energy produced.
E 'hardly necessary to point out that about 500 meters incinerator building rises from the power plant fossil fuel owned by the CIR (De Benedetti Group) Sorgenia from well 760MW , fnnzionante well since Jan. 27.
In a federalist logic , the regions' energy emergency "as Lombardy and Piedmont, should be made more autonomous in relation to their energy needs.
The "power station" Modugno is powered by fuel produced from waste at the landfill Conversano, landfill where Bitonto also gives their waste, 40% owned by the Group always Marcegaglia , with the right usage notes, without which it is made for a conflict of interest (?) COGEAM between the consortium that operates the landfill and the company will implement the 'incinerator, Eco Energy.
Cdr In the preparation of the fuel and / or CdrQ , to achieve an adequate calories, you add items similar to municipal waste in the Law of 02.05.1998 and produced by burning dust, dioxins, furans and metals, toxic and harmful to health .
