Sometimes confirmations are to what they already think about where you least expect it. Thanks to the blog
whiskers, bulletin of Giulio Mozzi, I learned that in an article in "Il Giornale" a wild Paolo Del should try to minimize the true extent of the increasingly dramatic events that are happening in Japan, after the nuclear power plant in Fukushima was seriously damaged by the devastating earthquake a few days ago.
deftly diverting the core of the discourse from its original position, our climbs in absolutely no comparison between the number of deaths required technologies "other" (coal, oil, natural gas, etc etc) and energy nuclear power. Evidently no one must have noted that there was never pretend to consider other technologies as "totally devoid of risks."
There is nothing in the world that is totally risk-free. The problem is the type of risk and extent of the consequences should be run. There is, quite simply, nothing more persistent in nature, a radioactive element. Do not turn it off, not cool, not to convince words. If you're lucky it has a short half-life, otherwise you've got it in the ass. The problem is this, and Del should or should not know or pretends not to know (bad shape anyway).
But the top we have it set when the following sentence: "... And could continue even without remembering the 2,000 dead Vajont, that is hydroelectric. "
Bravo. Go on, then.
Why not continue?
touch you collide with it because the bitter reality that the two thousand deaths in the tragedy were not" fault hydroelectric power, "but the recklessness of those who wanted at all costs to build a dam where you knew perfectly well that we should not do? even then raising it several feet during construction causing further disruption to the sides of the mountain-on time - has given way, causing what we know or do these things from "left-wing propaganda," these?
One of the manufacturers has run well killed, realizing the extent of consequences of what had been done, my dear Del Debbio.
Good thing he plays with words and not with cement and iron, Vala ... (And leave out the idea that it gives us clarity on this comparison forced and pretentious instrumental).
Debbio If he wanted to show that the "other" technologies are "bad", why not make sense to put it on atomic energy, has only been shown once again, if ever proof were needed, that make in the hands of Italian as a resource very risky than nuclear energy, would be a crazy own goal.
whiskers, bulletin of Giulio Mozzi, I learned that in an article in "Il Giornale" a wild Paolo Del should try to minimize the true extent of the increasingly dramatic events that are happening in Japan, after the nuclear power plant in Fukushima was seriously damaged by the devastating earthquake a few days ago.
deftly diverting the core of the discourse from its original position, our climbs in absolutely no comparison between the number of deaths required technologies "other" (coal, oil, natural gas, etc etc) and energy nuclear power. Evidently no one must have noted that there was never pretend to consider other technologies as "totally devoid of risks."
There is nothing in the world that is totally risk-free. The problem is the type of risk and extent of the consequences should be run. There is, quite simply, nothing more persistent in nature, a radioactive element. Do not turn it off, not cool, not to convince words. If you're lucky it has a short half-life, otherwise you've got it in the ass. The problem is this, and Del should or should not know or pretends not to know (bad shape anyway).
But the top we have it set when the following sentence: "... And could continue even without remembering the 2,000 dead Vajont, that is hydroelectric. "
Bravo. Go on, then.
Why not continue?
touch you collide with it because the bitter reality that the two thousand deaths in the tragedy were not" fault hydroelectric power, "but the recklessness of those who wanted at all costs to build a dam where you knew perfectly well that we should not do? even then raising it several feet during construction causing further disruption to the sides of the mountain-on time - has given way, causing what we know or do these things from "left-wing propaganda," these?
One of the manufacturers has run well killed, realizing the extent of consequences of what had been done, my dear Del Debbio.
Good thing he plays with words and not with cement and iron, Vala ... (And leave out the idea that it gives us clarity on this comparison forced and pretentious instrumental).
Debbio If he wanted to show that the "other" technologies are "bad", why not make sense to put it on atomic energy, has only been shown once again, if ever proof were needed, that make in the hands of Italian as a resource very risky than nuclear energy, would be a crazy own goal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment